|
ASK OUR LAWYER
BY ROD TAYLOR
July 2001
Q: I had an accident on my motorcycle.
Unfortunately, while riding to work, a deer suddenly darted in front
of me. I had nowhere to go and the resulting collision put me in
the hospital with bills of over $90,000.00. Now my health insurance
company is denying paying my hospital bills because I was on a motorcycle.
What should I do?
A: Sue the bastards. Since Congress
has passed HIPAA [the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996] many insurance companies have surreptitiously inserted
a provision in health insurance policies that (according to them)
gives them the right to deny coverage for activities that they claim
are ultra-hazardous. Many of the policies have language as follows,
"No coverage is provided for ultra-hazardous activities including
but not limited to motorcycling, sky-diving and auto racing."
These changes present a serious problem. However,
there may be avenues of attack. First, you should send us a copy
of your policy. We will examine that language to see if it complies
with all laws governing insurance companies. Next we should determine
if you have had proper notice of the exclusionary language denying
coverage. If, for example, the policy was negotiated by your employer
and you were not notified of the coverage change, that exclusion
may not be enforceable. Even if you had notice, you should be given
a reasonable time period in which to obtain coverage for your motorcycling
activities through other sources. State statutes govern this time
period.
From a public policy standpoint, the most important
activity should be in the courts and the legislatures. The policy
language defining motorcycling as ultra-hazardous should be challenged
in any case where benefits have been denied. Motorcycling is a primary
means of transportation for many of us. These unfair restrictions
threaten the lives and livelihood of may of us and must be addressed.
Additionally, all A.B.A.T.E. legislative outreach efforts should
be mobilized to confront our legislators at the state and federal
level to have this infringement of our rights redressed. If you
are a member of a union, a special committee should be formed by
your union to challenge the insertion of this language in any agreement
between your union and your employer.
Sad to say, this type of exclusionary language is
being slipped into health policies without coming to the attention
of your union representatives. The best way to stop this insurance
company strategy is to be aware of their actions and your rights.
We believe there are serious constitutional, legal and ethical problems
with this type of insurance company strategy. If insurance companies
can dictate no coverage for motorcyclists, what next? Check with
your benefits coordinator immediately to see if you are affected.
Let us know, too, so that we can start addressing this serious challenge
to our freedoms.
If you have any questions you would like to ask the
lawyer, please submit them to: ASK OUR LAWYER, P.O. Box 2850, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46206-2850, or email to mabeason@iquest.net.
|